New Year's Resolutions - Executive Compensation Style

Upper Saddle River, NJ - January 4, 2006 - We allwe can't afford to lose our top people". In reality, the
succumb to the annual ritual of making a bunch ofBoard's actions have weakened their own policies, and
resolutions about how we will change our lives with theignored the reality that there may be more capable
start of the New Year: eat better and healthier foods,individuals available in the marketplace that could
exercise more, reorganize our rather hectic andachieve the stated business objectives, despite the
stressful lives in order to live longer, and learn to enjoycosts involved in recruiting them. Similarly, a recent
what we have. In most instances, regardless of howexample where a Compensation Committee probably
dedicated we are to these resolutions, most of ourdid not fulfill its duties to the shareholders, Board or
good intentions give way to the realities and pressuresitself, was one in which the Committee provided a
of everyday living, and before we know it, we areseverance payment in excess of $5 million to an
pretty much back to where we were on Decemberexecutive who was forced out for poor performance.
31.Not only did the Committee fail in its duty as the
Executive compensation is, in many ways, treatedarbitrator of fair and justifiable compensation, but it also
very much the same way. Boards and theirset a precedent for others. The mixed message is
Compensation Committees set forth their resolutionsthat the executives will be rewarded, regardless of
on how they will tighten up the criteria for governingwhether or not they achieve the company's business
and determining executive compensation goingobjectives.
forward. Some of this idealism is internally generatedHow, then, can the Board and Compensation
based on reasonableness and a strong sense ofCommittee ensure that their "resolutions" result in real
responsibility on the Board's part. Unfortunately, thisand lasting changes? As with personal resolutions,
desire to tighten up the decision-making processchanges should be realistic and within the Board's
emanates from external pressures, namely thecapabilities to accomplish. Incremental steps are much
shareholders, investors and their "watchdog groups",more palatable and more easily achieved than
and various governmental agencies and their "kneedramatic changes. Don't resolve to overhaul the entire
jerk" regulations, including recent changes in accountingexecutive compensation program in one
and tax rules. After all, the basic premises behindall-encompassing action; rather, evaluate each portion
executive compensation has always been toof the package in a logical sequence over a period of
maximize the value to the individual while minimizing themonths. Some other thoughts for making resolutions
taxes to the executive and company, along withstick:
minimizing any negative accounting issues for the·Look at the roadmap: Review the organization's
corporation. These are over and above the basiccompensation philosophy to ensure it is consistent with
objectives of any compensation program, which arethe business strategy and driving the appropriate
four-fold:performance.
1.To provide the competitive package necessary to·Don't fix what isn't broken: If a plan is achieving
attract qualified talent;the goals of the organization and is motivating
2.To assist in retention of that talent, the proverbialexecutives to perform optimally, don't change it.
"golden handcuff";·Prioritize needs starting with the most critically
3.To provide the motivation needed to achieve desiredchallenged areas: Don't focus on annual incentives if
results, in effect, the "golden ring"; and lastly,long-term programs are suffering.
4.To focus the employee's attention on specific·Seek the guidance of outside advisors:
business objectives, so that what is achieved isProfessional service firms can be utilized to assist in
consistent with the business strategy.making resolutions happen, allowing the Board and
Just as New Year's resolutions are all too oftenCompensation Committee to focus on its most
sidestepped when realities of every day pressures areimportant responsibilities.
confronted, the Board's resolve to "do the right thing" is·Don't expect changes to happen overnight:
sometimes forgotten when undue pressures, whetherLasting changes, especially behavioral ones, should
competitive or self-induced, are encountered. Forhappen slowly, giving time for adjustment and refocus.
example, in the case of long-term incentives, we haveUltimately, change should begin at the source. The
seen the Compensation Committee give in and provideBoard and Compensation Committee should evaluate
an award, such as stock options, even though thethe Committee's charter to ensure that responsibilities
performance goals were not met and no incentiveare clearly defined, so that the document can serve as
award was warranted. The explanation often given isthe baseline for how it will conduct its duties relative to
that "it was out of the hands of the executives, andexecutive compensation.